Thursday, June 07, 2007

Spurs win Game 1

As was pretty much expected, the Spurs won Game 1 fairly easily, dominating the 3rd quarter in route to an 86-75 win.

But while the Spurs win wasn't surprising, the complete nonfactor of LeBron James was a bit surprising. LeBron was only 4/16 from the field, scoring 14 points, grabbing 7 rebounds, and doling out 4 assists. While he probably won't struggle like this all series, I think this is going to be a major problem for the Cavs.

Game 5 notwithstanding, LeBron still isn't that great of a jump shooter. His offensive game is more predicated on getting to the rim, and he's just not able to do that too effectively against the Spurs, the best help defensive team in the NBA. Even if LeBron gets by the strong on-the-ball defense from Bowen or Ginobili, he'll still have Tim Duncan, Fransisco Oberto, Robert Horry, & Co. at the rim. That's hard.

One more note on the Cavs, and that's to say that Larry Hughes should not be starting, and at no time should be guarding Tony Parker. I'm not big on Hughes anyway, but with him being hobbled a bit Parker can drive by him at will, as he showed. The less Hughes plays, the more Gibson plays, the better. Gibson was outstanding in Game 1.

For the Spurs, it was the same story as usual. Aside from a stretch in the 2nd quarter they were efficient offensively and superb defensively. Tony Parker was the high point scorer and he did play a terrific game, but Tim Duncan was the MVP. The numbers were impressive... 24 points, 13 rebounds, 5 blocks, but as is the case with Duncan the whole game was great. He was great in help defense at the rim, he didn't force things, and is always in the right position. Just a brilliant game from him.

This is how I think the series will go... both teams are strong defensively so the scoring will be low, but the Spurs are just too good and efficient to be beat in a 7 game series. I still believe LeBron will be good enough to get them a win or two, but beyond that, there's too much Tim Duncan and too much Tony Parker.

6 comments:

Kevin Hayward said...

I agree with you that the Spurs will take it (it would be hard to argue the point right about now), but I think they'll sweep.

And as for LeBron, it is a little weird that he didn't attempt to take the game over. The problem is that when he does try to make something happen, there are a lot of good defenders on the other side waiting to stop him. The Pistons are a good defensive team, but I think they are surpassed by the Spurs.

LeBron will get his championships, but I doubt he'll win #1 this year.

TJX said...

I disagree, I think that Hughes should be benched.

Anonymous said...

I think this was the wake-up call to the Cavs that was always going to happen.

The way they got past the Pistons was huge and obviously took a lot of effort. Now they're in the Final and looking around thinking 'we've made it' and it was going to take a big loss to get them thinking straight again i.e. about winning.

That's my opion anyways.

fullcourt said...

People are starting to write off the Cavs because of the defeat, but it's just Game 1. I don't think anyone should be writing whoever off until Spurs get win #3 while Cleveland has yet to get win #2. As long as it doesn't come to that situation yet, people should not turn their heads and keep their eyes on the television.

Can you believe Larry Hughes is making $10M more than LBJ each year? And all he really contributes is a decent defense on the perimeter, but not really mind-blowing or noticeable like Bowen or Bell. It is offset by his horrendous play on offense,so he is actually hurting the team more as his cons outweigh his pros. Harsh reality.

I think I'll make a post about that today.

Have a nice day Jon and the readers.

Anonymous said...

酒店打工 酒店兼職
台北酒店 打工兼差 酒店
酒店經紀 禮服店
酒店兼差 酒店上班 酒店PT 酒店應徵 酒店工作

Marcia Brown said...

Thanks for yet another first-rate article. I am always searching for super seo tips to recommend to my own readers. Thank you for making this article. It’s exactly what I was searching for. Truly terrific post.